Reading the offers

The first thing to find in any offer is not the headline number but the sentence that tells you what the wagering multiple attaches to. That single clause can change the turnover requirement by several times over, and it is usually buried a few lines below the dollar figure. Two related questions follow it: which games count toward the requirement, and which currency the whole thing is denominated in. This site states its own working assumption once, here, and applies it throughout: the wagering multiple is taken to apply to the bonus amount alone, and every figure on this site is in Australian dollars (AUD). Where an operator's term sheet says something different, the operator's term sheet wins, and the arithmetic below shows why the distinction matters so much.

What the multiple attaches to

A wagering requirement is a turnover figure: the total amount you must stake before bonus funds, or winnings derived from them, can be withdrawn. It is normally expressed as a multiple, for example "thirty times" or "forty times", and the critical question is what number that multiple is multiplied by. Two conventions are common in the market. Under the first, the multiple applies to the bonus amount alone. Under the second, it applies to the deposit plus the bonus, sometimes called the deposit and bonus base. The difference is not cosmetic.

Work it through with a hypothetical. Suppose a reader is considering an offer that promises a bonus of AUD 200 on a deposit of AUD 200, at a multiple of 40. On the bonus-alone convention, the turnover requirement is AUD 200 multiplied by 40, which is AUD 8,000. On the deposit-plus-bonus convention, the base is AUD 400, and the requirement is AUD 400 multiplied by 40, which is AUD 16,000. The headline offer is identical in both cases. The work required to clear it has doubled. It is worth being explicit that the forty-times figure in this example is this site's own working assumption, used here only to demonstrate the arithmetic, and that the deposit and bonus amounts are invented for the same purpose. No operator's actual terms are being described.

There is a third convention, less common but not unknown, in which the multiple applies to the deposit alone. That can produce a smaller requirement than the bonus-alone convention where the bonus is larger than the deposit, and a larger one where it is smaller, which is why reading the clause rather than guessing at it is the only reliable approach. The term sheet will normally name the base in plain words somewhere in its first few paragraphs, often in a sentence beginning "the wagering requirement applies to".

Two further arithmetic points belong here. First, the multiple and the base interact with the size of the bonus, so a very large bonus at a very high multiple can produce a turnover requirement far beyond anything a modest deposit would suggest. A bonus of AUD 500 at 60 times, on the bonus-alone convention, is AUD 30,000 of turnover. Second, some term sheets express the requirement as a total dollar figure rather than as a multiple. That is easier to read at a glance, but it hides the base, and a reader who wants to compare two offers should convert both to the same form before doing so. The number to compare is the turnover requirement in dollars, not the multiple and not the bonus.

Which games count

The contribution table is the part of a term sheet that determines how much of each dollar staked actually counts toward the turnover requirement. Not every game or game category counts in full, and the term sheet usually says so in a short table or a list of categories with a note beside each. The reason is mechanical: games differ in how much they return to the house over time, and an operator setting a wagering requirement will typically want a dollar staked on a low-margin game to count for less than a dollar staked on a high-margin one, so that the expected cost of the bonus is roughly similar whichever game the player chooses.

This site does not reproduce contribution percentages for any operator, and it does not invent them. The rule for a reader is straightforward: find the table, read the row that corresponds to the games you actually intend to play, and check whether there is a category marked as not counting at all. A game that contributes nothing still consumes your bankroll while contributing nothing to the requirement, which is the worst of both. Where a term sheet says a category is excluded from bonus play entirely, that is a different and stronger restriction than a zero contribution, and it is worth noticing which of the two applies.

It is also worth reading any note that accompanies the table, because contribution terms are sometimes varied by the operator after the fact, and the term sheet will say whether it reserves that right. If the table is absent from the summary you are reading, that is not a reason to assume full contribution. It is a reason to find the full terms before depositing. A term sheet that does not state the contribution of a category is not the same as a term sheet that says the category contributes in full, and the safer reading of silence is that the position is unstated.

The bet cap while a bonus is active

Most bonus term sheets impose a maximum stake per bet, spin or round while bonus funds are active. The purpose is to stop a player from converting a bonus quickly by staking large amounts on a small number of outcomes, which shifts the operator's exposure in a way the bonus economics were not designed for. The cap is written into the term sheet, it varies between operators and between offers from the same operator, and this site does not state a cap for any of them.

The consequence of breaching the cap is the part readers most often miss. Term sheets commonly provide that a bet above the cap, or a series of bets structured to exceed it in aggregate, may result in the bonus and any winnings derived from it being voided. That is a stronger outcome than merely having the excess stake not count. It can mean that a win which would otherwise have been withdrawable is removed because the stake that produced it was outside the permitted range. Whether a particular term sheet takes that position, and how it defines the breach, is a matter for that term sheet. The general shape to look for is a sentence that caps the stake and a nearby sentence that describes the consequence of exceeding it.

There is a practical reading habit that follows from this. Before playing with a bonus active, work out what your normal stake is and compare it with the cap. If your usual stake is above the cap, the bonus changes how you would have to play, and that is a cost of accepting the offer that does not appear in the headline figure. If your usual stake is well below the cap, the restriction is unlikely to bind, but it is still worth knowing where the line is.

The ceiling on what converts

Many offers cap the amount that can be converted from bonus funds into withdrawable cash. The term sheet will express this as a maximum conversion, a maximum win from the bonus, or a maximum withdrawal attributable to bonus play. The effect is that the bonus is not a promise of its full face value in cash even after the wagering requirement is met; it is a promise up to a stated ceiling, and the ceiling may be lower than the bonus itself once the requirement is satisfied.

The interaction with the wagering requirement is what makes this worth reading carefully. A high multiple on a large bonus produces a large turnover requirement, and if the conversion ceiling is modest, the reader is being asked to turn over a large sum for a capped return. That is not automatically a bad offer, but it is a different offer from the one the headline suggests, and the only way to see it is to read the ceiling alongside the multiple and the base. This site does not state a ceiling for any operator. Where a term sheet expresses the ceiling as a multiple of the bonus rather than as a dollar figure, convert it to dollars before comparing it with the turnover requirement.

Some term sheets also distinguish between winnings generated before and after the requirement is met, or between bonus funds and the winnings they generate. Those distinctions change which pool the ceiling applies to. The safe reading is to locate the sentence that says what happens to winnings at the point the requirement is satisfied, and to treat any ambiguity there as a reason to seek clarification before playing rather than after.

Expiry and the life of a bonus

Bonuses and the winnings derived from them normally have a limited life. The term sheet will state how long the bonus remains available, how long the wagering requirement must be met within, and what happens to any balance that remains when the period ends. The usual outcome is that the bonus and any winnings not yet converted are removed, though the precise treatment is a matter for the term sheet. This site does not state an expiry period for any operator.

There are two clocks to look for, and they are not always the same. The first governs the bonus itself: how long it sits in the account before it lapses. The second governs the wagering requirement: the window within which the turnover must be completed. A term sheet may give a generous window for the first and a tight one for the second, or the reverse. The binding constraint is whichever window closes first. Readers who intend to clear a requirement slowly should check both before accepting.

Expiry also interacts with the contribution table and the bet cap. A requirement that is achievable at a given stake within a given window may not be achievable if the games you prefer contribute at a reduced rate, or if the cap forces a smaller stake than you would otherwise use. Reading the three together, rather than each in isolation, is the only way to judge whether an offer is workable on your own habits.

Deposits, credit and cash

The minimum deposit is the threshold below which the offer does not apply. It is usually stated plainly, and it matters because a reader who deposits below it may receive nothing, or may receive a reduced bonus, depending on the term sheet. Check it before depositing rather than after. It is also worth checking whether the minimum applies to the first deposit only or to each deposit that qualifies for a separate bonus.

The other distinction is between credit and cash. Bonus funds are typically held as a separate balance, sometimes called bonus credit, which is not withdrawable until the wagering requirement is met, and which may be forfeited on withdrawal before that point. Cash, by contrast, is the reader's own money and is normally withdrawable subject to the operator's ordinary processing terms. The term sheet will say which of the two the offer provides, and it will usually say what happens to the bonus balance if a withdrawal is requested before the requirement is met. A reader who expects the bonus to behave like cash will be surprised by the first withdrawal attempt.

There is a related point about deposits made with different payment methods, and about whether a deposit made from an existing balance qualifies. Both are matters for the term sheet. Neither is uniform across the market, and this site does not assert a position for any operator.

What should I read first in a bonus offer?
The sentence that states what the wagering multiple applies to. If it applies to the deposit plus the bonus rather than the bonus alone, the turnover requirement can be several times larger for the same headline offer.
Why does the game contribution table matter?
Because a dollar staked on a game that contributes at a reduced rate, or not at all, does less toward the requirement than a dollar staked on a fully contributing game. The term sheet usually states the position, and this site does not supply percentages for any operator.
What happens if I bet above the maximum while a bonus is active?
Term sheets commonly provide that the bonus and winnings derived from it may be voided. The cap and the consequence are stated in the term sheet, and this site does not state a cap for any operator.
Is the whole bonus convertible to cash?
Not necessarily. Many offers cap the amount that can be converted from bonus funds, and the ceiling may be lower than the bonus itself. Read the ceiling alongside the multiple and the base.
Can I verify these figures on this site?
No. This site models and cites term sheets; it does not play, and no figure here was tested first hand. The operator's term sheet is the authoritative document in every case.
Does this site tell me whether I may play?
No. This page explains how to read a term sheet. It does not give legal advice and it does not say that play is lawful for any reader in any place.

Licensing note

The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) prohibits interactive gambling services provided to persons in Australia. Section 5(1) prohibits a prohibited interactive gambling service, and paragraph (e) of the definition catches a gambling service provided in the course of a business over an internet carriage service to a person at home. Nothing in s 5(3) excludes such a service, and the Act contains no category of licensed online casino that would be carved out, so there is no exclusion to rely on. Section 8B(1) addresses the only gaming exclusion, and it is place-based: it requires customers to be at a particular place, using electronic equipment made available at that place and available for use by any customer there, with the provider holding a State or Territory licence authorising provision at that place. That is not a description of play at home. Section 15(1) makes it an offence to intentionally provide a prohibited interactive gambling service with an Australian-customer link, with a penalty of 5,000 penalty units. The statutory liability is written about the provider, not the reader, and this note explains the legal position; it does not state that play is lawful for any reader.

Where to go next